yes matthew andress is
Jupiter u stupiter person
No the Hunger Games is more popular.
YES!!!! Definitely!!! Although there are not vampires....the hunger games are MUCH MUCH better
The Hunger Games and Battle Royale have a similar plot, but The Hunger Games is not a rip off. Here are some differences posted by our contributors:First of all, The Hunger Games is set in the future. Battle Royale is not.Battle Royale's "tributes" are captured and taken, the tributes in The Hunger Games are chosen.The Hunger Games can last longer than a day, Battle Royale's battles to the death do not.
NO!
Because her younger sister had absolutely no chance of surviving at all and Katniss loved her sister more than anything in the whole world.
NOTH-ING is better than the Hunger Games, but The Declaration by Gemma Malley and Uglies by Scott Westerfeld come a close second.
Definetly the hunger games because they got 68.3 million dollars on opening day for that movie!
three out of 5 people like the hunger games books more than Percy Jackson books
Well, this is an opinion based question, so some people may disagree with me. I believe Hunger Games is better than Avengers, but that is just my opinion.
The Titanic grossed $600,788,188 and had a production budget of $200 million The Hunger Games has so far grossed $357,066,467 with a production budget of $78 million If you do the math, The Titanic grossed $400,788,188 while The Hunger Games has grossed $279,066,467 so therefore the Titanic GROSSED more money than the Hunger Games has so far. Remember though, the Hunger Games is still in theaters and it will continue to make money.
If you ask me the Book is Better