the answer is yes, otherwise the american revelotion would have been an act of terrorism
Odysseus' actions may seem justified in the context of the challenges he faced and the need for survival during his journey. However, some of his actions, such as blinding the Cyclops, can be seen as ruthless and vengeful. Ultimately, whether his actions are justified is open to interpretation based on moral and ethical perspectives.
Setidious speech is defined as speech that challenges the basic institutions of government and government leaders. It is meant to incite rebellion and is illegal in the United States.
Not everyone will agree. If you believe Bonifacio's actions were tresonous, yes his execution was justified. If you believe his actions were not treasonous, then his execution was not justified.
Whether or not Lincoln's actions were justified is a matter of opinion. His actions had two purposes: he wanted to preserve the union and he wanted to end slavery. Compare that with perhaps one million men dead. In my opinion his actions were justified. You will have to decide for yourself.
According to the Equal Access to Justice Act, the prevailing appellant's attorney fees can be paid from the Judgment Fund if the government's actions were not proven to be substantially justified. The appellant has 30 days from the court's final judgment to file the application.
According to the Equal Access to Justice Act, the prevailing appellant's attorney fees can be paid from the Judgment Fund if the government's actions were not proven to be substantially justified. The appellant has 30 days from the court's final judgment to file the application.
Daniel Shays (Shays's Rebellion)
idk
no
no
no,
The suppression of the Whiskey Rebellion