It seems sensible to at least build enough new plant to replace the AGR's as they are decommissioned, and keep the fraction of nuclear at around 20 percent
I think it is for safe, The power station is esceply. wonder is it the right reason
Because it is supposedly leaking radioactive materials and is not up to safetly standards since it is so old.
The train station is in Saffron City. Near the top right of the city you will see a big building and that is where it is.
Only the Philippines can answer this
because it can always explode right there and then
Absolutely! Experience over the years proved Nuclear Power Stations to emit less radio active materials into our environment on a normal day than a Thermal, coal burning, station. As long as we can trust that these stations will be manned by the right competent personnel, it's a great sustainable idea for the future.
Iran is currently in the process of makes nuclear weapons although they say it is for friendly purposes but why are the making them for if it's for friendly purposes right?
electricity will be cheaper and it will reduce the need of oil
Type your answer the scientist is right ask him he knows the right answer i got a A+ on my test with that answer so trust me and him
Nuclear power is neither good nor bad. The way nuclear power is produced (Safety) can be good or bad, though. Nuclear power can be generated by small power plants, creates no air pollution, and is safe when done right.
You're kidding, right? The Empire State Building, The Chrysler Building, Central Park, Times Square, Grand Central Station ..........
It was shot from two corners on top of the 101 Park Avenue building in NYC. Right next to the Grand Central Station and the Met Life Building.