C Programming
C++ Programming

Is call by reference supported by pointer?

012

Top Answer
User Avatar
Wiki User
Answered
2012-09-28 12:48:25
2012-09-28 12:48:25

No, call-by-reference can be emulated with pointers.

001
๐ŸŽƒ
0
๐Ÿคจ
0
๐Ÿ˜ฎ
0
๐Ÿ˜‚
0
User Avatar

Related Questions


Example: void foo( MyClass& object ){} // function with call by reference signature MyClass* p = new MyClass(); // instantiate a pointer to MyClass foo( *p ); // call by reference using the pointer


When we call non static method with respect to class object then this pointer is created which keep the reference of that object.


pointer: to access data by address reference: there is no reference in C language


We don't call by reference, we call functions. The arguments passed to the function are passed (not called) either by value or by reference, depending upon the function signature (the prototype). When you pass by reference you are passing the actual variable, not a copy of the variable, thus the function can modify that variable's value directly. The only exception is when the parameter is declared a constant reference. Passing a pointer is essentially the same as passing by reference, however the pointer itself is passed by value. To pass a pointer by reference you must pass a pointer-to-pointer instead. Passing by value always copies the value, whether it is declared constant or not. But if it is declared constant, the function might as well accept a constant reference. Passing objects (instances of a class) by constant value will incur a performance penalty in making an unnecessary copy. If it is constant, there is little point in copying the object.


Whenever memory that was in use, and was referred to by a pointer variable, is freed, and the pointer variable is not updated accordingly (setting it to NULL, for example), the pointer variable is considerred to be a dangling pointer reference.


The difference that i learnt very recently and the one i remember :-)Reference cannot be changed whereas pointer value can be changed.Actually, const pointer = reference.


Not to be pedantic, but you cannot call a destructor explicitly. Destructors are implicitly called when an object falls from scope or when you delete a pointer to an object. Any object created dynamically (with the new keyword) must be deleted as soon as you are finished with it, and before the pointer falls from scope. In this sense, you are explicitly calling the object's destructor, however it's really being called implicitly by you deleting the pointer. It's also good practice to explicitly NULL your pointer immediately after deleting the object it pointed to. An object reference is destroyed automatically when the reference falls from scope. If you have a pointer to that reference, do not delete the pointer, but do assign it to NULL as soon as possible to prevent any access to the deleted object. If you do delete a pointer to a reference that's still in scope, you will render the reference NULL and a NULL reference will render your program invalid.


Call by reference does not necessarily mean you want to change something. It simply means that you are passing a pointer to the object rather than the object itself. This can be cost effective if the object is large, in comparison to a pointer. Making the call by reference const is an effective tool for doing this when you do not intend to modify the object, and you want to make sure you don't accidentally do so.


Double pointers are better known as pointer-to-pointer types. You use pointers to store the memory address of an object but when the object is itself a pointer, you need to use a pointer-to-pointer in instead. Pointer-to-pointer types are typically used when passing pointers into functions. Pointers allow you to pass objects to functions by reference but the pointer itself is passed by value. If you want to pass the pointer by reference, you need to pass a pointer-to-pointer.


A reference variable in C++ is a formal parameter of a function call that automatically dereferences itself, as if it were a pointer, into a reference to the original value in the calling routine. You declare the reference type in the function declaration and prototype, but the compiler automatically adds the reference (&) operator on call, and the dereference (*) operator on use.


By declaring an integer pointer you are declaring that any non-zero reference stored in the pointer is guaranteed to be an integer reference. In order to guarantee the reference is actually a structure, the pointer must be declared as such, because casting an integer to a structure can never be regarded as being type-safe.


In JAVA, all variables are reference variables, and there are no pointer variables. Even though the platform may implement them as pointers, they are not available as such. In C, no variables are reference variables. They are a C++ enhancement. In C++ a reference variable is syntactically the same as a pointer variable, except that the use of the indirection operator (*) is implicit. You do declare reference variables slightly differently than pointer variables but, once you do so, they can be treated as non-pointer variables. Reference variables also cannot be redefined once they have been initialized to point to some object. They are const. Structurally, there is no difference between a pointer variable and a reference variable. They are both still pointers. The compiler just makes it easier to treat reference variables and non-pointer variables the same way.


In .NET: Both are passed by pointer. However, call by value the actual value (caller value) passed will not change. Call by reference the actual value (caller value) passed will change.


No. Function parameters are passed by value. Always. Even the so called "call by reference" is a value - the value of the pointer or the address of the object - but what is placed in the parameter list is a value.


A pointer is an object that contains the address of another object. A deference'ed pointer is an object. It was a pointer, but its address was used to locate and use that other object as if it was the original target of the instruction.


A pointer is a reference to some chunk of memory on your computer. To actually get the value out of said chunk of memory, you must dereference it (i.e. *pointer).


Call by reference means calling a function using a reference to a variable or a pointer. You call a function by passing refrences to a variable. For eg: void x(int &a) { a=2; } void main() { int s=3; x(s); } OR void a(int &c) { c=5;}void main(){ int *p; *p=2a(*p);}


A dangling pointer (we also use the terms stray pointer and wild pointer) is created whenever we call delete on a pointer and then try to use the pointer without reassigning it.We can also create dangling pointers inadvertently by calling a rogue function that returns a pointer to an object that is local to the function we are calling. The object will fall from scope when the function returns so the pointer is left dangling.Note that there is no such thing as a dangling pointer reference. Pointers and references are not the same. A reference is merely an alias to an object -- it consumes no memory beyond the object it refers to. Whereas a pointer is a variable that may contain the address of an object, but it requires additional memory to do so (4 bytes on 32-bit architecture). Pointers may be NULL, references can never be NULL. Pointers to valid objects require indirection, references do not. References are the preferred method of accessing an object's members, not least because they are easier to work with.


On a near call, the stack pointer is 2 less than its original value. On a far call, it is 4 less.


absolute reference is the adress or pointer that does not changes while relative reference changes when the target item is moved or the relationship to it has changed


No , Java does not support call by reference.


Well, the pointer is a type of variables that stores an address in the Memory.the reference is the address itself of a variable.


We use a pointer to reference a string because a string is an array of characters where every element is a char (or a wchar_t if using UNICODE strings). Passing arrays by value would require the entire array to be copied, but passing a pointer variable to an array only copies the pointer, which is effectively the same as passing the array by reference. #include <iostream> int main() { char * psz = "hello"; // pointer to a null-terminated string. std::cout << psz; // pass the pointer (by value) to the insertion operator. return( 0 ); }


The only way to achieve this is to pass pointer variables. A pointer is a variable that holds a memory address and allows indirect access to that memory. When you pass a pointer to a function, the pointer is passed by value. But since the value of a pointer is a memory address, it is the same as pass by reference: template<typename T> void swap (T* a, T* b) { T* temp = a; a = b; b = temp; }


The C language does not support references, that is, the C++ concept of creating an alias to a variable. You can create pointers and dereference them, or you can use the preprocessor's #define mechanism to use another name for a variable. Even in C++, however, you cannot create a pointer to a reference. If you try to, you will end up creating a pointer to the original value. This is because all a reference is is an automatically dereferenced pointer - a compiler shortcut, rather than a totally new feature. So the limitation of not being able to point at a reference isn't really too bad.



Copyright ยฉ 2020 Multiply Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site can not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with prior written permission of Multiply.