A primary pollutant is emitted directly into the atmosphere, so exhaust, smoke and fumes are all primary pollutants. Acid rain is a secondary pollutant.
yes
In Canada, at least, you can search the National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI) to determine the levels of any specific pollutant from any area. Your local environmental control agency may have a similar searchable database.
Capital resource
1) Wasting of Water 2) Destroy of Forests/ Deforestation 3) Mixing of Factory wastes in the rivers/ seas 4) Smoke of Vehicles 5) Mining 6) Burning of Plastic Bags.
A very simple question sometimes does not lead to a simple answer. But, in general yes, similar in chemical composition, dissimilarities in pollution threat levels. A "pollutant" does harm to natural processes. Both burning of wood and fossil fuels generate carbon dioxide, and excess CO2 in our atmosphere contributes to global warming. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wood_fuel Wood burning creates particulate air pollution can contribute to human health problems and increased hospital admissions for asthma & heart diseases. Wood burning smoke pollutants include nitrogen oxide, sulfur dioxide, volatile organics, radioactive compounds, carbon monoxide, formaldehyde and suspect carcinogens (polycyclic aromatics and dioxins), See: http://www.lungusa.org/site/c.dvLUK9O0E/b.23354/k.100/Woodburning.htm According to the American Lung Association, oil or natural gas generate less pollutants in the home per btu, than wood. They also recommend on their website how to make wood burning safer. The fossil fuels are generally considered coal, oil and natural gas. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fossil_fuel The list of pollutants are similar to wood burning, CO2, nitrogen oxide and sulfur dioxide. Harmful volatile organics and radioactive compounds (uranium and thorium) are also produced as with wood burning. The pollution threat can not just be measured in what these energy sources produce, but how much they produce. Again, refer to Wikipedia under fossil fuels, and you will see that a steep increase in released emission of carbon to the atmosphere beginning in 1950 from fossil fuel combustion.
it is produced form animals, plants and factory.
There is to much heat from the exhaust manifolds. There should be medal factory heat sheilds bolted to the exhaust manifolds to pervent this from happening. INSTALL HEAT SHEILDS
The Burning of the Match Factory - 1912 was released on: USA: 20 September 1912
3.5 inch from factory
$150-$200
In Canada, at least, you can search the National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI) to determine the levels of any specific pollutant from any area. Your local environmental control agency may have a similar searchable database.
Flow master exhaust is usually cost more than factory exhaust. The benefits are better gas millage, more HP. and less restriction on the exhaust. Good choice on the exhaust.
You could always put factory exhaust back on it.
there should be screws and nuts on the inside of the exhaust connecting it to the body, if not then it is an exhaust that needs a sprecial tool, is it a factory exhaust or not? =]
this will more than likely hit you for $150 to $200
Manual calls for .012 for intake and exhaust with engine warm. I would go .010 on the exhaust and as low as .008 on the intake, factory lash is a little loose in most mechanics opinion. Set factory and it will be a little noisy, but its your call!
stainless steel, for the last 15 years or so
any exhaust place can make a new mid section of exhaust. u do not need factory parts for exhaust