It can be but the answer is going to always be - it depends. If the organization makes homogeneous purchases it may make sense because of bulk purchase discounts and loss of overhead (local purchasing labor). If the large company has operations world-wide it may make more sense to make some purchases locally while other purchases should be made corporately and shipped to each location. If you are referring to the centralization of purchasing to one department in a large company because purchases are made in many departments then I would posit it is much more efficient to have purchases made in the purchasing department. Without going into details purchasing departments are ripe for fraudulent activity. Without the details of the company it is difficult to answer the question. There is a balancing act to maximize the potential discounts one would receive for purchases, overhead (additional resources) to make purchases outside of corporate purchasing, shipping costs, potential for fraud, excess inventory levels, operational requirements (lead time). It just depends on the specific situation.
The greater the centralization,higher will be the span of control and vice versa.Span of control determines the no. of levels in an organization.
To bring about greater centralization and enhance the power of the Imperial Court
You don't. Such an efficiency can be less than 1, but it can't be greater than 1.
It is greater. You need to look for the SEER (Seasonal Engergy Efficiency Rating) to see the true engergy rating of the heat pump.
true
The efficiency of gas exchange in the lungs of vertebrates is greater because it increases the lungs' internal surface area.
Greater Richmond Transit Company was created in 1973.
When purchasing a Hybrid Crossover you can save money and increase fuel efficiency by putting on low-resistance tires. You may need to negotiate getting low-resistant tires put on when you purchase your hybrid crossover. Otherwise switch them out after purchase. It will be worth it in the long run in the money you save on greater fuel efficiency. Decreasing resistance by 20 percent may result in a five percent increase in fuel efficiency.
why efficency is greater than 1 in case of compound lever
The dime has a greater value in trade, and greater purchasing power, but the coin is physically smaller than the penny.
Efficiency cannot be greater than 100% because efficiency measures energy, and since energy is not made, only transfered (conservation of energy) then we cannot gain energy. Hence the energy out must be at most the energy in. Thus efficiency can be at most 100%
No, an efficiency greater than one would not be possible, since that would violate a very fundamental law of physics: conservation of energy. The efficiency of an "ideal machine" would be one, in many cases; the efficiency of an ideal Carnot engine would be less than one.