Yes - challenging people is a form of physical access control, hence it is a physical security measure. The challenged person must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the the guard (or person presenting the challenge) that they are authorized to enter the restricted area where the computer resources are located. They may be required to present a physical token such as a picture ID, biometric input such as a fingerprint, and /or a pass-phrase of the day (or any number of other authenticators).
Challenging is a physical security measure that is appropriate in certain situations. Places challenging people for security measures is appropriate are prisons and military sites.
challenge people
PEOPLE
Money is at least physical, no matter how poorly backed financially. The physical possession provides a feeling of value and security.
why is it challenging to prognosticate for people with dying with chronic illness
Allow people to enter the facility by following others.
If you enjoy helping and encouraging people, physical therapy is a great job. If you enjoy physically and mentally challenging work while upholding the law, become a police officer.
Provide support for people in challenging, etc.
Kick them in the balls
Security cameras pose no more of a physical threat to people than most other inanimate objects. The idea of whether or not security cameras are dangerous to one's privacy (Big Brother) is debatable. security camreras are defenitly not dangourous! how could they possibly hurt u?
That's an ethical dilemma, not a technical one. Security cameras pose no physical threat to people. Frankly, if you aren't doing anything wrong anyway, I can't see why a security camera should bother you.
Norton is a very popular security that people use. More likely than not, it can fix most viruses with relative ease. The more challenging ones that they cannot get you will most likely have to do a system restore back to the time before you had the virus and that'll fix the problem.