Yes
Bio warfare is living creatures; if a contaminated mosquito was delivered to the enemy that would be bio warfare. Chemical warfare is just what it says: chemicals.
no
trench warfare chemical warfare
The definition of the term 'chemical warfare' is warfare where one side uses chemical weapons to kill or injure those on the other sides. It is a controversial weapon and condemned by the UN.
really...
Warfare using mustard gas and chlorine gas.
It is an extremely subjective question to ask if violence can ever be justified and everyone has a different answer. The question has been argued about in philosophy for centuries.
John Cookson has written: 'A survey of chemical and biological warfare' -- subject(s): Biological warfare, Chemical warfare 'Using Unix'
What do you mean by related? Is it about chemical warfare? No. Is there some underlying theme about chemical warfare that is played out via symbolism in the story? I don't see how. Maybe read it and find out? it's good!
Yes, they are justified if they will help more than they will harm and if they are done with good intentions.
of course it was justified! The Egyptian people were mistreated and exploited by an insanley corrupt government.
The Supreme Court's ruling that chemical castration is a violation of the Eighth Amendment is justified because it prohibits cruel and unusual punishment.