0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Does the theory of pluralism state that all interests should be free to compete for influence and the result will be compromise and moderation?
Yes it does.
Is Great Britain pluralism or corporatist?
pluralism
Who demonstrates pluralism in art?
There is no one that demonstrates pluralism in art. Pluralism in art refers to the nature of art forms and artists as diverse. Pluralism shows differences between groups.
Why was the compromise necessary?
The Great Compromise was necessary because had it not happened, the Constitutional Convention would have disintegrated.
What is another name for multiculturalism?
Cultural diversity or cultural pluralism.
Do you cross match platelets?
Normally not necessary. do for immune compromise patient
What is the Fact of Reasonable Pluralism?
The Fact of Reasonable Pluralism refers to the idea that in diverse societies, people hold different reasonable beliefs, values, and perspectives. This diversity makes it necessary for societies to accommodate various viewpoints to maintain social harmony and respect for individual differences. Embracing reasonable pluralism involves recognizing and valuing the legitimacy of different viewpoints within a pluralistic society.
What type of government the public can have input in various areas of the country?
Pluralism Pluralism
What is a climate of pluralism?
In this phrase, pluralism is not referring to anything grammatical. It is referring to pluralism as a diversity of viewpoints or the stance that no one view is better than another.
What kind compromise was necessary for the Constitution to be accepted?
The main compromise in the original US Constitution was about slavery, which was permitted in some states and prohibited in others.
Should compromise and release be capitalized in a sentence?
No, "compromise" and "release" should not be capitalized unless they are at the beginning of a sentence or part of a proper noun.
What is feckless pluralism?
The term "feckless pluralism" is a 90% oxymoronic dysphemism most often used by fundamentalist ideologues attempting to discredit the concept of pluralism by inserting an assumption of inherent ineffectiveness.
