Want this question answered?
no they are not. nanoparticles are much smaller than normal/ordinary particles
Because they have red blood molecules of high intermolecular forces with under 20nm which allows it to quickly travel unlike normal sized particles in titanium oxide which are as big as over 300,000nm. Basically as the particles are smaller.
Why are I-message more effective than you-message
Get people to pay more. It's just a marketing gimmick."Nanoparticles" means, basically, "really really small bits." So a company advertising that their mascara has "nanoparticles" is really just saying "we powdered up the black stuff in our mascara really fine, so you won't have clumps of it the size of peas hanging off your eyelashes." While I suppose this is better than the alternative, the nanoparticles really don't do much of anything, other than (presumably) not form clumps large enough to be seen.(Soot, from a candle flame? That's pretty much ALL nanoparticles. So it's not like this is some exotic space-age material.)
There are some decisions that are more effective if made by a group. Other decisions are more effective if made by individuals.
Conjunctivitis tobramycin is more effective than gentamicin for a cat.
The fruit that is more effective at keeping people awake in the morning than caffine!
Pray. It's much more effective than searching the internet.
No
yes
We are not sure what you mean by effective, but if you mean "effective in killing you," the answer is yes.
Cycles are more effective than walking for the same period of time, though treadmills can be adjusted for inclines, which make them significantly more demanding.