The problem with any democracy- a Majority rules no matter what.
That is entirely a matter of opinion.
Bolivia is a democracy, we have no queen. or king for that matter, lol
In ancient Greece, the city state of Athens had a democracy where each and every citizen voted on a matter. The United States has an indirect democracy where the citizens vote for representatives into a body (the senate and house of representatives) and they are the ones who actually vote for legislation.
A representative democracy. And like pure democracies, they can vote on anything they like. A representative democracy that has restrictions, such as rights that people retain no matter what, is a republic.
In a dictatorship, only one person's opinion matters. In a democracy, multiple people's opinions matter. As a result, you are more likely to have disagreement in a democracy than a dictatorship. This disagreement is usually termed as "gridlock" by those who are annoyed by it.
4XFT
According to the Greek Philosipher Plato: A democracy, can not survive without an enemy.
Very simple. Democracy allows, or attempts to allow, people to govern themselves and decide how they will live. Theoretically no one is above the law in a democracy. With a dictatorship people are told what to do and how to live, and they have no say in the matter. It is possible for a dictatorship to be benevolent and a democracy to be unjust, but people will often choose democracy over dictatorship, if they have a choice.
The Roman republic was a democracy in which the government leaders were elected by the people to speak for them and to rule them. The Etruscan rule was that of a monarchy in which one man ruled and his word was law no matter what the people wanted.The Roman republic was a democracy in which the government leaders were elected by the people to speak for them and to rule them. The Etruscan rule was that of a monarchy in which one man ruled and his word was law no matter what the people wanted.The Roman republic was a democracy in which the government leaders were elected by the people to speak for them and to rule them. The Etruscan rule was that of a monarchy in which one man ruled and his word was law no matter what the people wanted.The Roman republic was a democracy in which the government leaders were elected by the people to speak for them and to rule them. The Etruscan rule was that of a monarchy in which one man ruled and his word was law no matter what the people wanted.The Roman republic was a democracy in which the government leaders were elected by the people to speak for them and to rule them. The Etruscan rule was that of a monarchy in which one man ruled and his word was law no matter what the people wanted.The Roman republic was a democracy in which the government leaders were elected by the people to speak for them and to rule them. The Etruscan rule was that of a monarchy in which one man ruled and his word was law no matter what the people wanted.The Roman republic was a democracy in which the government leaders were elected by the people to speak for them and to rule them. The Etruscan rule was that of a monarchy in which one man ruled and his word was law no matter what the people wanted.The Roman republic was a democracy in which the government leaders were elected by the people to speak for them and to rule them. The Etruscan rule was that of a monarchy in which one man ruled and his word was law no matter what the people wanted.The Roman republic was a democracy in which the government leaders were elected by the people to speak for them and to rule them. The Etruscan rule was that of a monarchy in which one man ruled and his word was law no matter what the people wanted.
Well it does to the people of NZ. The more say we have the better control we have on who helps run our government.
liberal democracy. Democracy altogether. socialist democracy. Democracy elite. A pluralist democracy.