Eaten is the past participle of eat, not the past tense. Ate is the past tense.
ate
The past tense of "eat" would be "ate". "Eaten" could be used as a past tense, too.
Eating is the present participle; eaten is the past participle.
"Ate" is the past tense; "eaten" is the past participle.
No. Eat is present tense, ate is past tense, and eaten is the past participle.
The past tense is didn't eat.
The simple past tense of "eat" is "ate" The past participel of "eat" is "eaten" The present tense of "eat" is I/you/we/they eat. He/she/it eats. The present participle is "eating"
Eaten is the past participle of "eat" The simple past tense is "ate"
The base word of the word "ate" is "eat." Eat is a present tense verb, and ate is the past tense of this word. Another past tense form of the word eat is eaten, as in "had eaten."
The past tense is ate.(Be careful - eat is an irregular verb which means the past participle is different. The past participle is eaten)The present tense is:I/You/We/They eat.He/She/It eats.The present participle is eating.The future tense is will eat.
No, "has eaten" is not a present participle. The present participle form of "eat" is "eating". "Has eaten" is a present perfect verb form.
"Had been eating" is the past perfect continuous of eat.
The past of eat is ate. Future tenses for eat are: will eat -- I will eat my lunch soon am/is/are going to eat -- We are going to eat later. am/is/are eating -- I am eating my lunch after the movie.