The past tense of "eat" would be "ate". "Eaten" could be used as a past tense, too.
Eaten is the past participle of eat, not the past tense. Ate is the past tense.
The simple past tense is 'drank' whilst the past participle is 'drunk'.
Eating is the present participle; eaten is the past participle.
"Ate" is the past tense; "eaten" is the past participle.
No. Eat is present tense, ate is past tense, and eaten is the past participle.
No, "have" is not a past tense verb. It is an auxiliary verb used to form the perfect tenses in English, such as "I have eaten." The past tense form of "have" is "had."
The simple past tense of "eat" is "ate" The past participel of "eat" is "eaten" The present tense of "eat" is I/you/we/they eat. He/she/it eats. The present participle is "eating"
The past tense is didn't eat.
No, "has eaten" is not a present participle. The present participle form of "eat" is "eating". "Has eaten" is a present perfect verb form.
Eaten is the past participle of "eat" The simple past tense is "ate"
The past perfect tense is used to show that an action was completed before another action took place in the past. For example, "He had already left before I arrived." The present perfect tense is used to describe actions that happened at an unspecified time in the past or have relevance to the present. For example, "I have finished my homework."
Since it is afternoon he has already eaten his lunch. (past tense). She will have eaten her lunch around noon time. (future tense).