Yes, usually hyphenated
The plural form of the compound noun editor-in-chief is editors-in-chief.The correct plural possessive form is editors-in-chief's.
The plural form of the compound noun editor-in-chief is editors-in-chief.The correct plural possessive form is editors-in-chief's.
No, the correct plural possessive form for the plural noun editors-in-chief iseditors-in-chief's.example: The editors-in-chief's committee has approved my investigative series.
None are. (see the related questions below)The plural possessive of editor is editors' but it cannot take a possessive in the combined form "editor in chief" -- the plural possessive is editors in chief's.
C, Editors-in-chief is the only correct plural form.The correct plural form of phenomenon is phenomena.The correct plural form of father-in-law is fathers-in-law.The correct plural form of attorney is attorneys.
The term 'editor-in-chief' is a compound noun, a noun made up of two or more words that form a noun with a meaning of its own.The compound noun 'editor-in-chief' is a word for a person.
The compound noun editor-in-chief is the singular form. The plural form is editors-in-chief.
Chiefs is the correct plural form of chief.
The plural form is editors. The plural possessive is editors'.
The plural form of the noun editor is editors.The plural possessive form is editors'.example: He's the guest speaker at the editors' conference.
The plural form for the singular noun editor is editors.
No, the plural form of chief is chiefs.