yes to prove that it can work at the start without failing while in operation
New scientific ideas are typically accepted or rejected based on the evidence supporting them. Ideas that are consistent with experimental data and can be replicated by other researchers are more likely to be accepted. Conversely, ideas that lack evidence or are inconsistent with established scientific principles are more likely to be rejected.
Scientific ideas are concepts or theories that are based on evidence, observation, testing, and logical reasoning. These ideas are developed through the scientific method, which involves making hypotheses, conducting experiments, and analyzing data to expand our understanding of the natural world. Scientific ideas are constantly being evaluated, refined, and expanded as new evidence and technologies become available.
Scientific debates let scientists work out different views. Debates present differing ideas and views with that scientist's "scientific evidence", but scientists do not always agree and cannot always resolve the problem(s). Debates are like a think tank. They generate more ideas than declaring one solution or answer.
Scientific ideas are modified when evidence is found that does not fit the predictions. The scientists determine why and revise the model to fit the new data.
when enough evidence contradicts earlier ideas
ya mum
New scientific ideas are typically accepted or rejected based on evidence, experimental results, and how well they align with existing theories and principles. Ideas that can be tested, replicated, and provide new insights into the natural world are more likely to be accepted. Peer review by other experts in the field also plays a crucial role in evaluating the validity and significance of new scientific ideas.
The most accepted form of scientific ideas are those that are supported by strong evidence, reproducible experiments, and consensus among experts in the field. These ideas are often published in reputable scientific journals and have stood up to rigorous scrutiny and testing.
The Scientific Revolution was a conflict between authority and evidence. Authority came in the form of the Church, which did not want to accept new scientific ideas. Evidence came in the form of experiments and observations that scientists were coming up with that were proven true repeatedly.
No. There is no real evidence about that
The pair of ideas central to the scientific revolution were empiricism, the idea that knowledge should be based on observation and experience, and skepticism, the questioning of accepted beliefs and ideas in order to seek truth through logical reasoning and evidence.
Briefly, the scientific method essentially involves postulating a theory, and then that theory will either stand or fall on the evidence of future experiments.