NO! Executing crininals is never acceptable. The law says, "Thou shalt not kill." If people would only follow the original ten laws than this workd might not be so messed up. Killing is killing and it don't matter who does it or for what reason they do it.
no
It is not acceptable. What makes it seem acceptable is that it is harder to catch these criminals, they can get away with a lot more money for the same effort as a regular criminal, and their friends write the laws.
Not since 1977; France abolished the death penalty in 1981, along with all other civilised nations.
The plot of the bank robbery book revolves around a group of criminals planning and executing a heist on a bank, facing obstacles and challenges along the way.
It is always acceptable for a business to check an employee's criminal history.
It's one man versus a bunch of super criminals, so YES. His parents died, so haha.
The justification of executing criminals is a deeply contentious issue that hinges on moral, legal, and practical considerations. Proponents argue that it serves as a deterrent to serious crimes and delivers justice for victims and society. Opponents contend that it risks executing innocent people, lacks evidence of deterring crime effectively, and raises ethical concerns about the state's role in taking life. Ultimately, the justification varies depending on individual beliefs about justice, human rights, and the effectiveness of the criminal justice system.
Many, many war criminals escaped justice.
None. Gangs are criminals. Don't be stupid. Don't ever in your life join a gang.
Light of course! Did Lelouch ever come up with a genius plan to rid the world of criminals? No. Did Lelouch ever have cool hair? No.
It is not acceptable under any conditions what-so-ever.
Hello child, this is Ms. Mannnerism Of course not, how ever do you think the term "pay for dinner not pads" was invented? This is not acceptable however, if the man is none other than your husband, it is fine and perfectly acceptable. ----