no
Depending on your lighting situation outdoors. But in your "artificial lighting" you can control you environment to a set focus that you prefer unlike my plants. I prefer the art of artificial lighting via I can control the maximum heat and output of lighting.
Some, but not all, plants need a wider range of illumination than is provided by fluorescent lighting. Incandescent bulbs give off heat and infared radiation, while fluorescent (cold) lighting is closer to the ultraviolet part of the spectrum.
Why? everyone was fed up with spending the time creeping around in the dark. Where? on the kitchen table.
its good because dying plants when they get microbes they die faster
i need to know where the first drive up window restaurant was and the first to have flouresent lighting and who the first was to introduce the onion rings to the world.
flouresent + firebird
No, water does not beat lighting. If it is for plants. Remember they use photosynthesis. so that's where plants get the energy to make food for them selves.
Wear it with confidence.
yes
no
Agapito Flores invented the fluorescent lamp...
Fluro is slang for fluorescent.
Yes they are
they don't
yes it does
dullish bright. It's not flouresent, and its not dark red.