It depends. If the chinchilla is small than it is really risky. The male should be the same weight if not lighter than than the female. If the babies are to big it is risky. It is better not to breed just in case. But ask your chinchilla's vet.
if they are litter mates yes but it is very risky for the female carrying the babies and the babies it is a very very very horrible idea
The female if not sepersted from the male will get pregnant with in 24 hours. Be very careful because that can be risky the female will get to stressed from all the babies and feeding she will start killing them. DON'T PUT THEM TOGETHER UNTIL THE BABIES ARE AT LEAST 4 WEEKS OLD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
well it is risky to give birth at 8 months because that is a young age and the cat could possibly die but it is highly unlikely but cats should give birth at 1 year or older
Pregnancy at the age of 42 is risky business, but yes, a healthy 42 year old woman can have a normal baby.
Anne Bradstreet wrote this poem to her husband in the ninth month of a pregnancy. Giving birth in that wilderness in those years was a risky business, and Bradstreet feared she wouldn't survive it, and she wrote this poem to speak to him Everything in the natural world will be destroyed. She starts saying there is sadness in the joy of her new child because of high mortality rate when giving birth. No one can escape death.
There are a few disadvantages of home birth. One disadvantage is that it is not as clean as being in a hospital, and in a hospital there are a lot of doctors around to help.
Possibly, if the giant is the mother- but very, very risky.
No it Isn't Risky is an adjective
RISKY
No, playful is a synonym for frisky, but not for risky. A synonym for risky could be perilous.
Yes, it is possible to have a first born child at 47, but it is risky and the mother to be must work closely with her doctor.
every birth and or c - section causes risk to the Michelle but she chooses to have more children.