No, not necessarily.
Imagine the US president, and the Queen of the UK. Both are democratic nations - the Queen is the UK's figurehead, the Prime Minister is a closer equivalent to the president.
But then also consider the so-called 'President for Life' of a Dictatorship, or a tyrannical despotic monarch. The average citizen will have a much better quality of life in the first two cases, than the second. So the title itself is not as important as the nature of the leadership and government.
Babe Ruth probably had that distinction. When asked about it he said that he was having a better year than the President.
NO
In a game of poker, having a straight is better than having three of a kind.
ace beats all
The queen can move farther and in much more ways than any other piece on the board.
better education? better advisors?
Usually if you are4 older you understand things better than a younger person or you may be able to make a better decision based on the situation, like having to go to war.
Yes, having three of a kind in poker is better than having two pairs. Three of a kind is a stronger hand ranking than two pairs in poker.
yes
In a game of poker, having a straight is generally considered better than having three of a kind.
Because they are more gentle and sometime smarter than male presidents
because he liked law better than politics.