If the husband is not a contractual party to the debt, then no, he is not responsible regardless of what state the debts originate from. If the debts were incurred pre- or post-nuptual, it still does not matter provided the husband is not a contractual party to the debt. If however the husband has any joint assetts with the wife, if the Washington creditor seeks to recover the debt by attaching assetts and discovers them in the state in which she currently resides with the husband, those assetts will be attached and disbursed to the creditors, regardless of whether or not the husband is a contractual party to the debt.
That depends on court orders, when they were incurred, who incurred them, your separation agreement, etc. You should call your lawyer and ask her to review your file.
Yes, they will be responsible. They are considered to have benefited from the goods and services of the utility.
Possibly. If you and he were still together when the medicall bills were incurred, then they are considered joint debt, so it will be part of the property settlement.
No, debts incurred before marriage do not become the joint responsibility of a new spouse.
Since a married couple are considered to be one economic entity, yes. The wife would be held responsible.
No she is not at all responsible for the bills.
yup
no.
You may be responsible, if it is not a legal separation.
Yes. When a couple is married, they are bound to one another. So, if there were medical bills, the closest related relative (or wife/husband) would receive the bill.
If the deceased person is your wife then I think you are responsible for her medical bills
Children become responsible for their own medical bills at the age of 18. This means that any bills that are incurred prior to the age of 18 are still the responsibility of a parent or guardian.