Yes. An interface in essence is a java class and so you can use the term interface class. But, using the term class along with the term interface can cause ambiguity or misunderstandings among novice java developers. So, using the term "Interface" along would suffice to refer to a type of class which is the "Interface"
Its an interface.
If a class has one abstract method ,the class has to be an abstract class.Methods can be implemented in abstract class.Whereas a interface is like a abstract class...the only difference being that the methods are never implemented in Interface.
In object oriented programming, a derived class inherits the protected and public members of its base class. Those members therefore define the interface that is inherited by the derived class. The derived class may augment that interface to provide a more specialised implementation of the interface, without the need to re-write the generic interface of the base class. The implication is that the derived class is a more specialised form of the base class.
The only function of a friend is to extend the private class interface outwith the class, essentially making the friend part of the class interface.
Yes
Yes. This is a valid interface definition in Java: interface Useless {}
Its an interface.
we can make object of interface but in abstract we can not make object of it interface ab= new Classs(): in interface we maintain multiple inhetence by use of obj of interface we if inherit two class have same fun then we give the name of that interface and call the pertucular that fun interface ab= new class() ab.add(); but in Astract Class we cannot make object of it only class class wich inherit it can make object class ab2= new Class(); and by obj we call function of drived class ob2.add();
interface inheritance is a misleading term. Interface inheritance would be equivalent to the union of the method signatures of interfaces ( no typo here, an interface may implment multiple other interfaces) Class inheritance - single hierarchy (in C#), and not only the methods are inherited, but also the data members. (interface in C# cannot define data members)
yes ,interface can be defined inside another class
If a class has one abstract method ,the class has to be an abstract class.Methods can be implemented in abstract class.Whereas a interface is like a abstract class...the only difference being that the methods are never implemented in Interface.
In object oriented programming, a derived class inherits the protected and public members of its base class. Those members therefore define the interface that is inherited by the derived class. The derived class may augment that interface to provide a more specialised implementation of the interface, without the need to re-write the generic interface of the base class. The implication is that the derived class is a more specialised form of the base class.
Yes, you can create a static class inside an interface, but it is normally not a good idea.
The interface of a C++ class is the public methods and attributes that are exposed by the class. In a pure abstract base class, the interface is enforced by the compiler in each of the derived child classes.
The only function of a friend is to extend the private class interface outwith the class, essentially making the friend part of the class interface.
Yes
In Java, an interface is a suite of methods that multiple different classes are able to implement. Interfaces are not assigned to any particular class. For example, multiple graphics classes can use the same interface to change their size and colour.