Multiple producers mean competition and lower prices - avoiding a sole producer becoming a monopoly
There is more than one producer of course, but just picking one,You can contact Greg Weismanthrough LinkedIn
A herb starts with an 'H' but there is more than one producer,there's grass,seeds,and trees too.AND MORE
There are better teams. But no one has one more trophies than Glasgow Rangers.
Two blankets are better than one, because they provide more warmth, shelter, etc.
There was actually more than one person, The Producer and all of the staff.
Yes, chickens are social and do better with a "flock", even when the "flock" is simply one more bird.
The producer becomes more self-sufficient.
Two cooks are better than one because you can then get more things done at one time. (But of course you would need space for that) :-)
In basic economic theory, it is because of revealed comparative advantage (RCA). If two people can make two products, there is always an RCA such that the two can produce more together if each one specialises. Even if one person is a less efficient producer of both products, it is better for that person to produce what they are less bad at producing and let the better producer concentrate on whatever they have the greater edge on. By doing so, the two can produce more together than going it alone. Then, they trade - and that is where the commerce comes in. As a result, each person would be better off than trying to be self-sufficient and not trading.
Xbox one is better because it simply is more advanced; watch the E3 videos
If the answer gives more new information (or a better understanding), the question is better.
yes