Yes, it is a correct sentence. The verb 'is moving' indicates that 'February' is a time in the future. The preposition 'in' before the noun 'February' indicates that the move will take place sometime withing that month.
You and your dad went to the store
The stationary store carries free grammar worksheets. It is free to low income families or if you make a small donation to the local charity of your choice.
They're is a contraction of "they are". There is a place name substitute. The correct sentence is "They're (they are) going to the store".
David and you is correct. Easy way to remember is to make both singular in a sentence. You would say.. David is going to the store. You are going to the store. Not... David is going to the store. Yourself is going to the store. So when you combine the two they must make sense just as you would speak. David and you are going to the store. Hope this helps.
The terms "in store" and "in-store" have two different meanings.The term "in store" is a prepositional phrase. The noun "store" is the object of the preposition "in".Example: We don't know what will be in store for us.The term "in-store" is a compound adjective, a word used to describe a noun.Example: I set up the in-store display of the new product.
Yes, it is a correct sentence. The verb 'is moving' indicates that 'February 2008' is a time in the future. The preposition 'in' before the noun 'February 2008' indicates that the move will take place sometime within that month.
You and your dad went to the store
Correct: "Go visit your nearest grocery store." Incorrect: You're is a contraction, meaning you are. It would be the same as saying, "Go visit you are nearest grocery store."
Having correct grammar is crucial to communication. The answer to number 15: "John and I are going to the store. Would you like to come along with" is "him and me".
It depends on the structure of the entire sentence. For example, "Bill, Bob, and I are going to the grocery store" is correct grammar in that sentence, but "Sandra is going to meet Bill, Bob, and me" is also grammatically correct because of the structure of its sentence. It really all depends upon the context in which the phrase "Bill, Bob, and I" are being put into. == ==
"Mrs. Smith went to the store." Or: "She went to the store." Never "Mrs. Smith she went to the store." The subject of the sentence is "Mrs. Smith" - if you also have "she" then you have the subject in there twice (if this will help you to remember that you only need one of these).
The preposition at is used before an object of the preposition in a sentence. It should not be used at the end of a sentence. Examples: "I was at the store." - Correct (store is the object of the preposition.) "Prepositions should not be used at the end of a sentence." - Correct (end is the object of the preposition that goes with at.) "Where is my phone at?" - Incorrect Instead, one would say, "Where is my phone?"
The proper use is "he and she" when referring to subjects, and "him and her" when referring to objects. For example, "He and she are going to the store" versus "I gave the book to him and her."
"If you were to go to the store" is a clause that introduces a cause and effect relationship. Note that it is a hypothetical condition that requires the subjunctive mood of the verb "to be". The sentence could be finished with a condition that will occur as a result: If you were to go to the store you would see that the turnips are on sale. The use of "then" to join the two is optional.
Not exactly. It is an example of very colloquial, vaguely ethnic dialect.
Depends on usage. Subject- he and she, object- him and her. Examples: He and she went to the store. I sent him and her to the store.
The correct spelling is "grocery store" (supermarket).