Yes, that is a grammatically correct sentence.
Communicating would be to tell the research of what the experiment is going to be unless a hypotheses is correct for an experiment.
the answer is a experiment that is controlled
Hitlers personal surgeon. ( i guess you could say Hitler)
in the scientific method the hypothesis is always assumed correct until proven wrong by the experiment that is being performed
Dalton performed the cathode ray experiment.
Dalton performed the cathode ray experiment.
A hypothesis is tested by an experiment. A hypothesis is an estimate or guess about an outcome. The experiment proves whether the hypothesis is correct or not correct.
An experiment is performed to generate more data. If the data proves to not support the hypothesis the experiment was still useful. You could reproduce your experiment to see if it is performing the way it should. After you have confirmed the experiment is performing correctly you then could devise another experiment to further test your hypothesis or accept the result and revise your hypothesis.
in 1745 an english needham's performed an experiment to support abiogenesis
An experiment in which the results are repeatable....apex
Yes, although if the experiment is performed correctly there should be relatively little chance of this occurring. This is referred to as a type II error in statistics - the data supports rejecting the hypothesis even though the hypothesis is correct.
An experiment might not support a hypothesis even if the hypothesis is correct because if the conclusion