answersLogoWhite

0

No. Not in any grammar I've herd.

User Avatar

Stephany Herman

Lvl 10
2y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Is it correct to say you have been reached home?

No. Not in any grammar I've herd.


Is it correct to say 'Have you reached at Delhi'?

No. Say, "Have you reached Delhi?" You don't need the "at".


Is it correct to say 'back in home'?

No, it is not correct.It is correct to say "back home"


Is it correct to say 'i am in the home'?

No! "I am in the house" "I am at home" "I am home" "I am in the home of ___" are correct.


Is it correct to say Have you reached safely or Do you reached safely?

The correct phrase is "Have you reached safely?" This is because the verb "reached" is in the past participle form, which requires the auxiliary verb "have" to form the present perfect tense. "Do you reached safely" is grammatically incorrect because "do" is used with the base form of the verb, not the past participle.


Is it correct to say homework was sent home?

Yes!it is correct to say homework was sent home.


Is it grammatically correct to say back to home?

It is always back home and not back to home as to is not added before home.


Is it correct to say When you get back home tell her to call me?

Yes, it is correct to say 'when you get back home, tell her to call me'. You insert a comma after the word 'home'.


Is it gramatically correct to say you go to home instead of you go home?

It is not grammatically correct to say ' you go to home'. Instead you should leave out the word to, and say 'you, go home'.


Is it correct to say me at home?

It depends on the rest of the sentence. For example, it is correct to say Come see me at home, or You will find my sister and me at home. You could say "I'm at home" just "Me at home" is incomplete.


Is it correct to say you would have reached two months ago?

It is not correct because the verb "reached" requires an object. As such, it should be phrased "You would have reached it two months ago" or, in place of the it, you can use any other noun or pronoun as an object.


Which is more correct you could be reached at a phone no or you could be reached on a phone no?

You should say "you could be reached on a phone no", not "you could be reached at a phone no"But the no at the end of both your phrases is also grammatically incorrect.So you should really say "you could not be reached on a phone," if I understand correctly the meaning of you phrase.