0
No. Say, "Have you reached Delhi?" You don't need the "at".
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the correct spelling of purpose?
Purpose is the correct spelling. (Object to be reached/a target or goal)
What is correct may reached or may reach?
it's different depending on the sentence
Is it correct to say 'for your reference'?
It is correct
Is it correct to say carefully or more carefully?
It is correct to say them both, but it matters on what you want to say.
Is grammatically correct to say enjoy your vacations?
no it is not correct to say enjoy your vacations
Rita will reach Delhi by saturday change to future perfect?
The correct sentence is - Rita will reach Delhi on Saturday
What is correct gramatically-i welcome you in delhi or at delhi?
i welcome you TO Delhi.
How can you reached instituto Cervantes de nueva delhi place?
Instituto de Cervantes in Delhi has moved to Hanuman Lane in Connaught Place, New Delhi and can be reached on 011 43681900
Is it correct to say Have you reached home?
No. Not in any grammar I've herd.
Is it correct to say you have been reached home?
No. Not in any grammar I've herd.
He left to Delhi yesterday correct this?
He left to Delhi yesterday. Yesterday, he left for Delhi. He left yesterday for Delhi. He went to Delhi yesterday.
Is it correct to say you would have reached two months ago?
It is not correct because the verb "reached" requires an object. As such, it should be phrased "You would have reached it two months ago" or, in place of the it, you can use any other noun or pronoun as an object.
Which is more correct you could be reached at a phone no or you could be reached on a phone no?
You should say "you could be reached on a phone no", not "you could be reached at a phone no"But the no at the end of both your phrases is also grammatically incorrect.So you should really say "you could not be reached on a phone," if I understand correctly the meaning of you phrase.
Is 'on discussion' correct grammar?
Yes and no. Generally we say a matter is in discussion. Use on only in this sense: On further discussion a consensus was reached
How do you say New delhi in french?
the French use the same name, New Delhi
Is 'can be reached on his cell phone' correct or 'can be reached at his cell phone'?
Either one is acceptable.
How do you say sir in New Delhi?
Sir
