No. The correct way to say it might be:
You are born in May.
Are you born in May?
I am born in May.
You were born on May 22.
If you were born on Nov 22nd, you were born on the cusp. It is correct that you are Sagittarius on the cusp.
It is correct to say "original cited" when referring to original sources that have been referenced or cited. "Original sighted" is not a standard term and may lead to confusion.
No. "May I see your passport, please?" is probably the best way to say it. "For" is not used with "request": you can request someone's passport, or you can request that someone show you his passport. And since requesting is already asking for something, it is redundant to use both "may I" and "request".
This is not acceptable in English English but it may be in American. (Americans say: meet with you. In England we say: meet you.)
No, it is not common to say "Let me try your ware." A more natural way to say this might be "Can I try your product?" or "May I sample what you have?"
No. If you are talking about indirect speech then - I asked him when he was born - is correct. If you are asking about direct speech then - "When were you born?" - is correct
No, isn't correct.
This phrase is not grammatically correct. One may say, "regardless of ... " or "whether or not ... "
no
If you were born on Nov 22nd, you were born on the cusp. It is correct that you are Sagittarius on the cusp.
I was born, you wouldn't use i have born in that context
He was born in Essex. You may want to improve your grammar. As "were" is not correct. Where would be correct as it involves a place.
Better to say, "He was born in 1889."
You may say: you are adapted to all situations.
Yes, it is grammatically correct to say "Write this in your copy." You may be trying to say "Write this on your copy," but both work.
No. The correct English is "I was born in Canada" and "You were born in Canada."
Yes, that sentence would be grammatically correct.