No, there must remain alternatives for those who oppose war as a matter of conscience.
because rich people pay poor people to fight in the war because they don't want to fight in the war
It meant poor white trash fighting for the continued wealth of slave-owners
No they did not fight in the war. They took care of the soldiers in the war. Where they worked was called the Red Cross.
An act for "enrolling and calling out the National Forces"
Rich men could pay a man to take their place in the draft. Therefore poor men fought in a rich man's place.
People in the South referred to the Civil War as "The rich mans' war and the poor mans' fight" because the North [the rich men] due to the industrial revolution had more money and you tactics and weapons one might use in a major war. While the South [the poor men] were still economically based through agriculture and did not have the extra money the North had because they stayed that way and did not industrialised the South had to use more common weapons and different tactics to match up with the weapons they had to use.
every man came to fight in the war at 19
A duty NO. The U.S. must fight when America's safety or interests are involved though.
no wish i could though :(
every man had to war to serve there country
Alot
no only in world at war, black ops and black ops 2