No. Assuming the tenant permitted the plumber to enter the property, it would not be trespass.
The plumber could not collect fees from the homeowner if the tenant authorized the work.
Yes, if you carry liability insurance on your homeowners policy and you are found liable for an injury to another while on it your insurance company would respond to a notice of loss.
Generally no. The only time that your homeowners policy will cover property of anyone else is if you are legally liable for the damages. For instance if you started a fire on purpose for some reasonable need that got away from you and they neighbor demanded payment. In this case you turn it over to your insurance company which will decide how to proceed. You liability section provides coverage for damages and they will provide legal defense in addition to the liability coverage if necessary. I will caution you that liaiblity claims will make you typhoid Mary to insurance companies and you will not have luck getting or keeping homeowners insurance.
totally legal with parental consent
If they are doing the marriage legally, nothing (unless you were required to give consent, in which case you shouldn't have given the consent if you didn't wnat them getting married).
No. If your mother has sole legal custody she can consent to your getting married.
Yes, this is called a "cash for keys" deal. Banks may offer these types of deals to the homeowners to entice them to leave the property voluntarily without causing any damage. The typical process is that a local real estate agent will visit the borrowers to offer them a few hundred or a few thousand dollars to leave the property and turn over the keys. Before the homeowners are given the check, the real estate agent is given the keys and can quickly inspect the property to make sure it has not been damaged. If all is well, the borrowers get some extra money to move out. These types of deals are not that uncommon.
no you do not have to have parent consent if you are 18 years old you are a legal adult and can do what you please.
In general, yes, but the mechanics of it depend upon the underwriting guidelines of the insurer. By that I mean the circumstances and terms under which the company will accept the risk of loss. Many insurers are concerned that the risk of loss will increase if the property is uninhabited, as there will be no one present to take care of it. That may be the case if the property is embroiled in a probate proceeding. That said, the insurer may still insure it if certain conditions are met which will vary with the insurer.
This is the story circulating in Arizona: "There are thousands of homeowners facing foreclosure who simply walk away from their properties and their mortgages. The lenders are left to deal with the financial fallout. Many who owe more than their houses are worth abandon their homes and mortgages and are not too concerned about the hit to their credit score. Some homeowners are combining that strategy with a new one. They are buying new homes before their old homes go into foreclosure, and then walking away from the old homes and the old mortgages. What these homeowners hope to achieve is getting out of their current untenable mortgage situations with a new home and a new mortgage. It appears that so long as the homeowners don
18 without parental consent.
It depends on the state, but probably with parental consent. The prospect of a teenager getting parental consent is not an easy task.
Potential safety hazards associated with a broken chain link fence include: Increased risk of unauthorized access to the property, leading to potential theft or vandalism. Danger of animals or children escaping from the property and getting injured or lost. Risk of injury to individuals from sharp or protruding edges of the broken fence. Reduced security and privacy for the property, making it more vulnerable to intruders.