It depends on the person and their point of view. I would not think it is right just something that has to be done.
Some ethical frameworks might argue that it is permissible to tell a lie in extreme situations, such as to avoid torture, if it prevents harm without causing significant harm to others. However, honesty is generally valued in ethical principles, so the decision to lie in such circumstances is complex and may depend on individual beliefs and values.
Not so much as lie, but we see in Genesis when Abraham was asked who Sarah was by pharaoh, he answered she is my sister. If he had said wife then pharaoh would have certainly killed Abraham to make sarah his own wife.
However this was not a lie. Sarah, as well as being Abrahams wife, was indeed his sister also. Therefore Abraham didn't lie. If pharaoh asked, is this your wife, abraham would certainly of said yes.
This had repercussions though, as now the Egyptians did not trust the Hebrew people.
No, a no contact order and a restraining order are separate legal actions. A no contact order may remain in effect even after a restraining order expires. It is important to follow the terms of both orders to avoid legal consequences.
In Virginia, a stay away no trespassing order is typically valid for one year. However, the court has the discretion to extend or modify the order based on the circumstances of the case. Make sure to comply with all terms of the order to avoid legal consequences.
No, if you have a restraining order against someone, you should not approach them in a public place. It is important to adhere to the restrictions outlined in the restraining order to avoid legal consequences and ensure the safety of all parties involved.
A proxy can be used in Robert's Rules of Order when a member who is unable to attend a meeting designates another member to vote or act on their behalf. However, the use of proxies may be limited or prohibited depending on the organization's bylaws or rules.
Jay's Treaty was signed in 1794 in order to resolve issues between the United States and Great Britain, including British seizure of American ships and impressment of American sailors. It aimed to improve trade relations between the two countries and avoid a potential war.
It depends on the person and their point of view. I would not think it is right just something that has to be done.
no.
they were allowed to torture slaves in order to get info.
The best way to handle an order that could place you in danger or may be morally wrong is to take it to your manager. Your manager will help you determine the best approach.
Yes, of course. That's point of torture is subject the victim to excruciating pain - usually in order to obtain a confession or information.
No. The final syllabel of order is pronounced with a soft d sound followed by the long r. The final syllabel of torture is a hard ch followed by the long r. Proper rhymes with order are boarder, border, hoarder, warder and recorder.
But, besides that, torture is only legal in a mandate... or court order, as a form of interogation: Mainly in China, Russia, Germany, Japan, and other "old" countries.
In order to avoid desiccation
No, Nero committed suicide in order to avoid the death sentence.No, Nero committed suicide in order to avoid the death sentence.No, Nero committed suicide in order to avoid the death sentence.No, Nero committed suicide in order to avoid the death sentence.No, Nero committed suicide in order to avoid the death sentence.No, Nero committed suicide in order to avoid the death sentence.No, Nero committed suicide in order to avoid the death sentence.No, Nero committed suicide in order to avoid the death sentence.No, Nero committed suicide in order to avoid the death sentence.
To be morally good requires the HolySpirit. When one surrenders his/her all to Him, He makes them 'new'. One cannot be good except it is given him by the Spirit of GodThe question, as it is worded, makes absolutely no sense.
Avoid rush hour
Avoid rush hour