Yes, but all the world's attention is on the reverse, the replacement of conventional energy by non-conventional, so I don't see the point of the question
nonconventional: water, sun, wind They're expensive They can be recycled (not sun) and don't pollute. good long term effects conventional: oil, coal, electricity Global warming good short term effects non-renewable
That's because 1) we need energy, and 2) there are certain problems with conventional energy sources - including scarcity of the resources, and pollution.
Conventional sources are the same as conventional sources.
In the future, new sources of energy will develop. For example, it may be possible to release energy from hydrogen in water or cold fusion may even become possible. The quicker these new energy sources become possible, the quicker we can stop using fossil fuels such as coal and oil.
Sources of what?
Please define "conventional sources."
Non convetional sources are not popular because they are not conventional sources which are popular...
Conventional energy sources are coal, oil, natural gas, and hydraulic energy sources.Non conventional energy sources are nuclear, solar, wind, geothermal, wave, tide, and biomass energy sources.
Conventional sources of energy have been in use for a long time that usually cause pollution and are exhaustible. Non-conventional sources, meanwhile, are recent sources of energy that are inexhaustible and pollution-free.
non conventional
IT IS NEcssary to create non conventional sources because they help to
"In Good Hands" is an example of a catchy slogan on conventional sources. "American By Birth Rebel By Choice" is an example of the non-convectional sources slogan.