0
In The Bible, Jesus taught to never be violent. He said to not return evil with evil, but to return evil with love. He said to love our enemies.
So, no a Christian should not use violence in protests.
AnswerMost Christians refuse to use violence in protests because:- Jesus said revenge was wrong and he urged people to forgive others "Forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us"
- Most people realise that the press and the media are more likely to cover the story if they refuse to use violence. Using violence makes them no better than their enemies and the people they are protesting against.
- Peaceful methods of protest can work just as well (e.g marches, letters, speeches, petitons)
Another answer:
No, Christians should never resort to violent protests. Sadly, many forget that their most powerful weapon against injustice is PRAYER!
What else can I help you with?
What is the difference between violent protests and non-violent protests?
violent protest is like the suffragettes they used violence to get what they wanted and nonviolent is where you use powers of persuasion to get your way and not to use violence.
What is better violent protests or non violent protests?
Islam and quran both are against use violence in any action where violence could have been substituted for non-violent actions there really isn't a better or worse to either one, they are both protests and, according to history, both usually end with getting what they were about.
Was Malcolm X a Protestant?
In one word: yes. Malcolm X never used any violence in his protests. He threatened the use of violence (in self defense) to deter any would-be violence used on him.
What method of protest did gandhi use to end discrimination against Indians in south Africa?
he led non violence protests
What do religious organizations do to stop war?
Religious organisations such as Christian Peacemaker Terms partake in peaceful protests in areas of conflict. They use non-violent methods like diplomatic marches in order to get their point across without the need for aggression or violence.
Why did Mandela decide to use violence?
Malcolm X did not "use violence." He advocated for the moral right to use violence against an unjust aggressor attempting to do violence against you.
What protests did Malcolm X do?
Malcolm X protested for the civil rights of African-Americans in the United States in the 1960s. He is often accused of advocating violence because of his use of radical language. But Malcolm only advocated the use of violence as a form of self defense. He threatened the use of violence by his people as a deterrant to those who would use it on them.
How is physical violence a good example of how protests might degenerate?
Physical violence during protests can lead to injuries, property damage, and loss of life, detracting from the intended message of the protest. It can also alienate potential supporters and give authorities a reason to use force in response. In extreme cases, violence may escalate the situation and shift the focus away from the original cause of the protest.
Is it all right to use violence to solve a problem?
usually it isn't
What is a person opposed to the use of war or violence to settle disputes?
A person opposed to the use of war or violence to settle disputes is often called a pacifist. Pacifists believe in resolving conflicts through nonviolent means such as diplomacy, negotiation, or peaceful protests. They advocate for the importance of peace and the avoidance of physical harm or destruction.
John brown was right to use violence to protest slavery?
NO BITCHESS nope
John brown was right to use violence to protest slavery.?
NO BITCHESS nope
