It depends on whether this is a direct question or indirect (reported) speech. The word order is different for a direct question: "What time are you meeting today?" If you are using indirect speech, however, the original word order is correct: "Please let Corinne know what time you are meeting today."
The correct phrase is "today's meeting." Using the possessive form "today's" indicates that the meeting is happening on the specific day that is being referred to.
"What time is our meeting tomorrow?" is acceptable grammar.
The word today is a possessive in the noun phrase "today's meeting" (meeting happening today). The word today is an adverb in the verb phrase "meeting today" (occurring today). The latter is unusual but not unseen in sentences such as "The President will be today meeting with his Cabinet" instead of "The President will be meeting with his Cabinet today" especially if there is a longer object such as "meeting the most vocal critics of his plan to end the ongoing crisis" where the "today" could be too far from the verb modified. More typically, the "today" is used to start the sentence.
Yes. If you are looking at her schedule and someone wants to know what she is doing.Another way to say this is, "She is in a meeting right now."
I'm in a meeting right now = Ya estoy en un mitin
lorsque nous sommes réunis aujourd'hui
Both wordings of the question are correct and have almost the same meaning, but asking "what time is the meeting at?" is asking for more exact information than just asking when in the day it is.
Mark and I sat down for a meeting. "I" always goes last.
Check their history
In a formal meeting, you say, "The meeting is adjourned."
Although the word "keen" is not commonly used in the 21st century, the time to say the phrase "keen to meet you" is when meeting someone for the first time, at the beginning of the meeting. "Keen on meeting you" or "nice meeting you" is said at the end of the encounter, when saying goodbye.
Looking at it today through today's sense of right and wrong and what have you, I would be inclined to say yes, it was abusive. But at the time it was not.