No, there is evidence that the universe is expanding, because we have observed red shift in many outer solar systems. If the universe is expanding, it must have started at a point of singularity, and expanded from there. Also, we can detect radiation from the very beginning of expansion.
It is not so much that the universe is expanding, but rather the rationalization for its expansion that provides evidence to support the Big Bang Theory. The Big Bang supports interpreted observational evidence of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) barrier that there is an evolutionary expansion of the universe which promotes a finite age for the universe.
It is not so much that the universe is expanding, but rather the rationalization for its expansion that provides evidence to support the Big Bang Theory. The Big Bang supports interpreted observational evidence of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) barrier that there is an evolutionary expansion of the universe which promotes a finite age for the universe.
The cosmic background radiation - in the microwave part of the electromagnetic spectrum.
The red shift doesn't just indicate that there is evidence for the Big Bang theory: the Hubble red shift is evidence supporting the Big Bang theory.
The red shift and the cosmic microwave background radiation was the evidence used to develop the big bang theory.
no the no. of stars in the milky way is not the evidence in support of the big bang cosmology.
He doesn't
the big bang occured
edwin hubble
OK, I'll ask. "What is the evidence?"
No, it's the other way round. The Big Bang is responsible for the redshift.
the big bang theory