0
Is it true or false that Aristotle believed that true ignorance is a good excuse for bad behavior.?
Wiki User
∙ 7y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Aristotle believed that intoxication was a legitimate excuse for bad moral behavior?
No, Aristotle did not believe that intoxication provided a legitimate excuse for bad moral behavior. He emphasized self-control and moderation as key virtues, and believed that individuals are responsible for their actions regardless of their state of intoxication.
Is excuse an abstract noun?
Yes, "excuse" is an abstract noun. Abstract nouns refer to ideas, concepts, or qualities that cannot be perceived by the five senses. In this case, "excuse" represents a reason or justification for an action or behavior.
How are reason and excuse similar?
Reason and excuse are similar in that both are used to justify or explain a situation or behavior. However, a reason is usually based on logic or reality and provides a legitimate explanation, while an excuse may be seen as a way to avoid responsibility or consequences.
What is the difference between a reason and an excuse?
A reason is a valid explanation for an action or decision, while an excuse is an attempt to justify or defend behavior that may not be valid. Reasons are based on logic, whereas excuses often involve deflecting responsibility.
What does it mean when someone wants to cop out on something?
They changed their mind and no longer want to do it. It implies they had a lame excuse to not doing as they indicated they would do, or as they were obligated to do. A "cop out" is a lame excuse.
Aristotle believed that intoxication was a legitimate excuse for bad moral behavior?
No, Aristotle did not believe that intoxication provided a legitimate excuse for bad moral behavior. He emphasized self-control and moderation as key virtues, and believed that individuals are responsible for their actions regardless of their state of intoxication.
Can you be prosecuted for a crime if you dont know it exists?
The question is extremely unclear. . . BUT - - "Ignorance of the law is no excuse!"
Can a insurance billing specialist escape liability by pleading ignorance?
No. Ignorance is not an excuse to evade the law. Can a drunk driver evade a ticket and possible jail time by pleading ignorance? Can a hunter avoid being charged with hunting out of season (poaching) due to ignorance? The simple and lawful answer is NO.
If a citizen claims ignorance of the law is he responsible for his crime?
Yes, he is still responsible for his crime. Ignorance of the law is no excuse. It is your duty as a citizen to know, understand, and obey the law. This is why laws are written.
What is a controlled behavior?
Controlled behavior refers to actions that are intentional, conscious, and regulated by an individual in response to a specific situation or circumstance. It involves choosing to act in a certain way based on personal values, beliefs, or goals, rather than reacting impulsively or unconsciously. Controlled behavior is often deliberate, goal-directed, and guided by self-awareness and self-regulation.
Can A citizen escape the consequences of breaking a law by proving they had no knowledge of that particular law?
I studied this in my 10th grade business law class. Ignorance is no excuse for not following the law. HOWEVER, if you end up in a case where you feel as though the law (ex. Speed Limit) was not properly displayed, then you could POSSIBLY fight that. But ignorance is NEVER an excuse.
Can a 17 years old boy say ignorance of a law is an excuse as being young?
Nope minor or not, Ignorance of the law is not a valid reason for committing a crime. Youth MAY be taken into consideration by a prosecutor & a judge, but that is up to them.
What is a controlled?
An controlled behavior is a child who wants something like a lollipop from a man but she asks mommy first. She says "Excuse me Mommy can I have that lollipop that man is giving me?" Not interrupting but tapping and saying "excuse me" are signs of a controlled behavior
What excuse did Randy make for Bob's behavior?
Randy excused Bob's behavior by saying he was under a lot of stress and not feeling well.
What are the distinction of ignorant leges non excusat?
ignorant leges non excusat means that ignorance of a given law is not an excuse to that criminal charge.
Another word for excuse that is 2 syllables?
There are several 2 syllable words which can appropriately substitute and directly replace the use of excuse. For example:Pardon (me) for excuse me.I cannot condone (his behavior) for I cannot excuse his behavior.I exempt him from these duties for I excuse him from these duties.As well other 2 syllable words for what excuse may be intending to imply are:explain and defend.Chris Mar
Why is ignorance is no excuse of the law?
Ignorance of the law is not an excuse because the legal system operates under the principle that individuals are expected to know and abide by the laws that govern them. Allowing ignorance as an excuse would undermine the integrity and effectiveness of the legal system by providing an easy way for individuals to escape accountability for their actions.
