True
true
All scavengers eat, it's part of the definition of the word. But not all things that eat are scavengers. Predators aren't scavengers, but they are consumers. Scavengers actually can not exist without primary consumers to scavenge off of.
The Amazon Rainforest is full of animals that all contribute to the area's ecosystem. The rainforest has primary consumers that eat the plant life. These consumers are eaten by secondary consumers, or carnivores. When the carnivores die, they are consumed by scavengers and decomposers, Then, the cycle begins again.
If there were no scavengers then all the dead animals would rot .
Yes, all lions are consumers. All animals are consumers.
Yes, they're all consumers.
true
true
All scavengers eat, it's part of the definition of the word. But not all things that eat are scavengers. Predators aren't scavengers, but they are consumers. Scavengers actually can not exist without primary consumers to scavenge off of.
true because secondary consumers eat plant eaters which are the predators.
consumers
false
true
tRUE
Yes. If all the question's parts are true, then the answer is true. If all the question's parts are false, then the answer is false. If one of the question's parts is false and the rest true, then the answer is false. Logically, this is illustrated below using: A = True, B = True, C = True, D = False, E = False, F = False A and B and C = True D and E and F = False A and B and D = False If you add NOT, it's a bit more complicated. A and NOT(D) = True and True = True NOT(D) and D = True and False = False NOT(A) and NOT(B) = False and False = False Using OR adds another layer of complexity. A OR NOT(E) = True OR True = True NOT(D) OR D = True OR False = False NOT(A) OR NOT(B) = False OR False = False Logic is easy once you understand the rules.
True. All squares are rectangles, but not all rectangles are squares.
Dictionary meaning's are all true they are not false.
true