answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

true ...............

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Is it true or false that scientific experiments undergo peer review in order to verify their results?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

A team of scientists has consistently gotten the same unexpected results from a set of experiments. What would help the scientists ensure the reliability of the results?

Peer review of the scientific methods and data analysis


What is the process called that use to check each other's work?

Through peer review


What does a scientist need to review before conducting an experiment?

results of other experiments related to the subject.


Before conducting an experiment a scientist needs to review?

results of other experiments related to the subject.


Is the scientific method based on personal judgment?

There is a degree of that in it, but ultimately peer review of research papers and experiments eliminates its effects as a consensus is reached in the scientific community.


How do scientists check others work?

Scientists repeat each others experiments to see if they get the same results.This is why scientists write up papers to be published in scientific journals with very specific information about what they did in the experiment and the results they got. This lets other scientists verify the results by repeating the experiment.By peer review


Why is peer review important when publishing experimental results?

peer review makes the result more reliable


Explain how peer review affects scientific knowledge?

to claim you have tested something scientifically is one thing but to have others scrutinise your tests and results is a peer review.


What is the process used to determine whether experimental results should be published in scientific journals?

peer-review process


What does a climate does?

A climate scientist studies the data and experiments of other scientists. They do experiments to confirm or reject the results of others' work. This is called peer-review. The produce theories to explain changes in the climate and perform experiments and computer modelling to see if they can prove their theories correct.


How did the government enforce ethical standards of scientific experiments?

If the government wished to enforce ethical standards for scientific experiments, they could appoint some person or agency to review all scientific publications, in search of experiments which seem to be unethical, which could then be investigated further and, if actual ethical violations are found, prosecuted under whatever legislation was passed to create ethical standards (or possibly under existing laws about cruelty to animals).


What are the four basic steps Of scientific inquiry?

1. Observation and description 2. Formulation of a hypothesis 3. Use of the hypothesis to predict results of new observations. 4. Peer Review of hypothesis and results