true ...............
Peer review of the scientific methods and data analysis
Through peer review
results of other experiments related to the subject.
results of other experiments related to the subject.
There is a degree of that in it, but ultimately peer review of research papers and experiments eliminates its effects as a consensus is reached in the scientific community.
Peer review of the scientific methods and data analysis
Through peer review
results of other experiments related to the subject.
results of other experiments related to the subject.
There is a degree of that in it, but ultimately peer review of research papers and experiments eliminates its effects as a consensus is reached in the scientific community.
Scientists repeat each others experiments to see if they get the same results.This is why scientists write up papers to be published in scientific journals with very specific information about what they did in the experiment and the results they got. This lets other scientists verify the results by repeating the experiment.By peer review
peer review makes the result more reliable
to claim you have tested something scientifically is one thing but to have others scrutinise your tests and results is a peer review.
peer-review process
A climate scientist studies the data and experiments of other scientists. They do experiments to confirm or reject the results of others' work. This is called peer-review. The produce theories to explain changes in the climate and perform experiments and computer modelling to see if they can prove their theories correct.
If the government wished to enforce ethical standards for scientific experiments, they could appoint some person or agency to review all scientific publications, in search of experiments which seem to be unethical, which could then be investigated further and, if actual ethical violations are found, prosecuted under whatever legislation was passed to create ethical standards (or possibly under existing laws about cruelty to animals).
1. Observation and description 2. Formulation of a hypothesis 3. Use of the hypothesis to predict results of new observations. 4. Peer Review of hypothesis and results