0
Is it true that changing the interpretation of the constitution what makes us weak?
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
Yes Its true
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
The constitution makes itself the supreme law of land?
true
Is it true the amendment is one of the ways the Constitution and the government can respond to the changing needs of the country?
Yes it is and no its not
A historian's upbringing can influence their interpretation of historical events true or faulse?
True.
What does correctness?
Noun - the action or process of changing something wrong into the right thing or form; a change that makes something true or accurate; the act of punishing and changing the behavior of people who have broken the law or rules
What is true regarding the Preamble to the constitution of the sasds?
it explains why the constitution was written
Is british constitution a true constitution?
Depends on what you mean by a "true constitution". The British don't have a codified, written document that they identify as their constitution. It consists of a number of different laws and precedents relied upon by Parliament.
True or false The US Constitution created a direct democracy just as each state Constitution had?
The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the United States? true or false
What statement is true about the constitution convention?
One true statement about the Constitutional Convention, was that not all of the delegates were willing to sign the Constitution.
How does judicial interpretation change the Constitution?
The operative word in the question is "interpretation". That is, the Constitution is a static document in terms of the words that were used by its drafters. There exist those who are often called "strict constructionists", who believe that little more should be read into the words of the Constitution than appear. This is particularly true when it comes to the severe limitations that the Constitution places on the encroachment of the Federal government into State authority and into individual freedoms. This is in contrast to those who believe that the Constitution was intended to be more elastic, creating only a general outline of our government and rights. This group tends to think that the Drafters recognized a need for more of an organic Constitution that would accommodate a changing country and politic. As such, it welcomes an activist judiciary, and often advocates for positions, rights, entitlements, and prohibitions that, although not specifically provided for in the Constitution are thought to come under an elastic "penumbra". To the extent that it is the function of the judiciary, and particularly, the United States Supreme Court, to ultimately interpret constitutional provisions, it might be said that judicial interpretation "changes the Constitution".
Is this statement true or false The sunface of the earth is still changing?
True for A+
When an ecosystem is balanced none of its parts are changing true or false?
true
The Constitution is extremely adaptable but it does it need periodic changes?
true
