Yes
no it isnt its the study of living organisms interactions with its enviorment
No. Animals always consume matter from other organisms.
true animals are animals that look like animals, think like animals walk like animals and are animals
No. Bacteria are classified as prokaryotic. Eukaryotes have differing traits from prokaryotes - most notably they have nuclei where prokaryotes do not have nuclei. Viruses are classified as neither prokaryotic or eukaryotic but are considered to be living organisms as well.
This is true because there were (and are) a wide variety of animals, some that seem to be a mix between plants and animals, but are more animal than plant or vice versa. This certainly makes it quite complicated and confusing when it comes to the categorical process of scientifically naming plants and animals.
No,it is not true. No animals have chloroplasts
True Because without plants we be dead and animals too.
most things are multicellular. all animals and plants :-)
No. According to cell theory, the cell is the basic unit of all living things - therefore all living things are made of cells (some are made of a single cell, these are known as unicellular organisms).
False. Life forms can be categorized as eukaryotes and prokaryotes firstly. Eukaryotes, example your plants ,animals, protists and so on are comprised of multicellular organisms which have membrane bound organelles and then the prokaryotes, example bacteria and archaea lack these membrane bound organelles.
True. Think plants.
Eukaryotes are organisms with a "true" nucleus and membrane-bound organelles. This means that their DNA is covered by a phospholipid membrane and contains various organelles made of same materials. In that sense, many things are considered eukaryotic. Mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, fish, plants, and even protists are all eukaryotes.