yes it is true
The more similar the two groups are, the most recent the common ancestor probably is.
Similar features in organisms that do not share ancestry means both organisms adapted to their environment. They developed the features to survive.
That they have a common/similar ancestor. This means that before, possibly these animals came from a similar organism.
Because, in the very distant past, humans and worms had a common ancestor.
No, b) a common ancestor.
Common ancestor, or convergent evolution to the same function
Yes. If genetic information is similar, then the organisms had a common ancestor. The more similar the genes, the more recent the ancestor, as in, the more closely related the organisms are. If anatomical patterns are similar to genetic similaritiesm, then chances are the patterns are fairly accurate.
It implies that the organism shares a common ancestor.
It implies that the organism shares a common ancestor.
It shows that the organisms are somewhat related. It is evidence that they had a common ancestor.
Charophyte.
Archaebacteria is probably more likely to be the ancestor of eukaryotes because of certain similarities, such as the ribosome of the two groups being much more similar to each other than the ribosomes of bacteria.