answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Out of these two options, the former would be the better option. Because the sentence has the present tense of argue rather than the past tense, "argued", it would be appropriate to match it with the present tense verb of "is".

User Avatar

Wiki User

โˆ™ 13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

โˆ™ 1w ago

It is better to say "some people argue as if it were a general truth that" because using "were" in this context signals that we are talking about a hypothetical situation or a statement that is not necessarily true.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Is it true to say some people argue as if it is a general truth that or it is better to say some people argue as if it were a general truth that?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Is it bad if you pop your nuckles?

People argue about this, but the truth is... there is no proof that it is beneficial or harmful to the body.


Are the people of Colorado attractive in general?

We generally believe that to be the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.


Why do girls argue about whether or not to tell the truth in crucible?

because they don't want to tell the truth


Why the showbiz people lie?

so they have a better story but they only add to the truth


When was General College Truth Movement created?

General College Truth Movement was created in 2005.


When you need overtime it is better to sell people then tell the truth and upset them?

always true


Why is the truth so hard to accept?

Some people just dont want to hear the truth because it might hurt them alot, but telling the truth is better than lying though.


Is it correct to say some people argue as if a thing is a general truth or is it better to say some people argue as if a thing were a general truth?

Use it were after "as if." Although the subjunctive is almost obsolete in English, it survives in usages such as this, called unreal conditions.__________That is an interesting question. The form "as if a thing were true" is in the subjunctive, a grammatical mood that is all but dead in modern English. It expresses possibility, doubt, or a conditional idea. "If mom were alive, she would rejoice at your news!" You might be tempted to conclude that in the context of the question the subjunctive is the correct choice, because there is doubt involved. However I tend to think that the speaker is stating that some claim that a thing IS a general truth, presumably when there is little or no evidence, or when there is disagreement among factions. More than likely the speaker would not be making the statement if the people referred to are doubtful about the thing being true.So as much as I regret the passing of the subjunctive, I would say "as if a thing is true". But I would not consider the subjunctive to be wrong. In many cases, correct language is the language used by careful speakers, and this is a reason that languages, especially English, change over time. Grammarians may cringe at this assessment.


Who is better Carlito or R-truth?

R-truth


Why is it Speak the Truth and not tell the truth?

"Speak the truth" is often used to emphasize the act of verbalizing the truth, while "tell the truth" is more general and can refer to both speaking and non-verbal ways of expressing the truth. Saying "speak the truth" highlights the importance of openly communicating truthfully.


Is that balija naidu is kshatriyas varna?

Yes of course,the nayaks are all naidu caste they are ruling and warrior clan and some people may argue but the original truth can't be hidden


What is the kernel of truth that mentally ill people are violent?

Actually, the incidence of mentally ill people becoming violent are about the same as the incidence in the general population.