Out of these two options, the former would be the better option. Because the sentence has the present tense of argue rather than the past tense, "argued", it would be appropriate to match it with the present tense verb of "is".
It is better to say "some people argue as if it were a general truth that" because using "were" in this context signals that we are talking about a hypothetical situation or a statement that is not necessarily true.
When referring to someone who speaks bravely and honestly, you could say, "She is a real sojourner truth." This means the person is candid and bold, similar to how Sojourner Truth was known for her powerful speeches advocating for social justice.
truth
"Is it better to speak or die" is a quote from Euripides's play "Alcestis." The line raises the question of whether it is better to speak the truth and face the consequences or remain silent and preserve one's life. It explores the themes of honesty, integrity, and sacrifice.
The headline "Major calls for peace summit" is in the present simple tense. It describes an action that is currently happening or is a general truth.
Will you tell me the whole truth?
People argue about this, but the truth is... there is no proof that it is beneficial or harmful to the body.
We generally believe that to be the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
because they don't want to tell the truth
so they have a better story but they only add to the truth
General College Truth Movement was created in 2005.
always true
Some people just dont want to hear the truth because it might hurt them alot, but telling the truth is better than lying though.
Use it were after "as if." Although the subjunctive is almost obsolete in English, it survives in usages such as this, called unreal conditions.__________That is an interesting question. The form "as if a thing were true" is in the subjunctive, a grammatical mood that is all but dead in modern English. It expresses possibility, doubt, or a conditional idea. "If mom were alive, she would rejoice at your news!" You might be tempted to conclude that in the context of the question the subjunctive is the correct choice, because there is doubt involved. However I tend to think that the speaker is stating that some claim that a thing IS a general truth, presumably when there is little or no evidence, or when there is disagreement among factions. More than likely the speaker would not be making the statement if the people referred to are doubtful about the thing being true.So as much as I regret the passing of the subjunctive, I would say "as if a thing is true". But I would not consider the subjunctive to be wrong. In many cases, correct language is the language used by careful speakers, and this is a reason that languages, especially English, change over time. Grammarians may cringe at this assessment.
R-truth
"Speak the truth" is often used to emphasize the act of verbalizing the truth, while "tell the truth" is more general and can refer to both speaking and non-verbal ways of expressing the truth. Saying "speak the truth" highlights the importance of openly communicating truthfully.
Yes of course,the nayaks are all naidu caste they are ruling and warrior clan and some people may argue but the original truth can't be hidden
Actually, the incidence of mentally ill people becoming violent are about the same as the incidence in the general population.