No, it is not true that you can substitute a ten for a fifty in Roman numerals. A ten is a ten and a fifty is a fifty and it an entirely different number. The number 38 is correctly written in Roman numerals as XXXVIII. The numeral XXLVIII is not a correct Roman numeral at all. While an L may correctly be preceeded by an X it should not be preceeded by XX. If it were a correct numeral XXL would mean 20 before 50, which equals 30, but as XXX already equals 30 there would never be any logical need to invent another way to express this value, especially when the supposed alternative way isn't any shorter or easier.
XXXVIII is the number 38 in Roman numerals.
It is: XXXVIII = 38
X = 10 and XXX = 30. V = 5 and I = 1 so VIII = 8 (5 + 3), so XXXVIII equals 38.It is already a Roman number which stands for 38 in Hindu-Arabic numerals
iT IS 38
Roman numerals do not have any symbol occurring consecutively more than three (or sometimes four) times. A number such as 38 000 would be written as the symbol XXXVIII (the Roman numeral for 38) with a horizontal line over the top. The horizontal line indicates the number is multiplied by ten thousand.The remainder of the number would be written as 529 is normally written: DXXIX
it is thirty eight. 38
What kind of letters?thirty-eight or XXXVIII
The number 200 is already in numerals
The number one is I in roman numerals.
The number 951 in Roman numerals is CMLI
The number 638 in Roman numerals is DCXXXVIII
The number 1999 in Roman numerals is MCMXCIX