Technically, if one is hungry, one should go eat; if someone is hungry, he should go eat. However, it has long been the custom of English speakers to use "they" (an imported, Scandinavian word, by the way) as the third person singular pronoun of unspecified gender when the antecedent is "someone" or "a person" and so forth. Political mis-correction insists on the awkwardly unnecessary "he-or-she" in that context, but the old way is best, at least in speech. In writing, try to avoid using the ugly he-or-she by restructuring the antecedents into the plural.
In the example given, using "they" to refer to one person is not technically incorrect but it can be confusing. To make it clearer, you could use "he or she" or simply use "he" or "she" depending on the context. Alternatively, you could rephrase the sentence to say "If someone is hungry, he or she should go eat."
After "no," we use a singular noun. For example, "No child" instead of "No children."
Bob ate a large dinner; however, he is still hungry.
"Texas has a lot of electrical votes" is an example of a malapropism. The correct term should be "electoral votes" instead of "electrical votes."
No, it is not correct to say "combine something together with" because the word "combine" already implies bringing things together. You should use "combine something with" instead.
Yes, "think of" is correct and commonly used in English. It is often used to suggest considering or imagining something. For example, "Think of a solution to the problem" or "Think of your favorite childhood memory."
Because some people believe that caring and doing something about such people is more important than research into space.
When you are bored you should get up and do something and not eat unless you are hungry.
if they are thirst or hungry they can get something easy and fast
Yes, indeed you can. It happens to me a couple times a week for no discernible reason. Sometimes I can tell I should be hungry but instead I feel a burning nausea. I force myself to eat, usually something fatty/salty like Taco Bell, then I feel better.
Well sometimes you don't know your hungry. But your stomach might growl and you can see that your not hungry but your stomach is. And sometimes your stomach is not hungry but your are youll have a feeling in your tummy. So that's how you know if your hungry or not.
no, it isnt. although you dont feel hungry you should still eat something no matter what it is as your baby need nutrients and vitamins from your food.
a guy from Yugoslavia went to Uganda to document hungry Africans, but they were trying to eat their feet from hunger and he thought 'I should probably invent socks or something'
Hungry... Then it should hurt after then again hungry
yes and you should always know to not look at something yummy or youll get hungry
If you are a girl then no. of course not "why should there be something wrong with that". instead that should be great because you can have something to think about. and it doesnt matter what gender you are.
I think that if you are hungry, you should definitely eat but if it's not time to eat, have a small snack like fruit. If you can't than you will just have to try not to think about it and concentrate on something else.
Christ above culture is something that most believers have trouble with. It is simply that those who believe should follow Christ's example, instead of doing whatever the culture dictates.