When an electron absorbs a photon of light, it gains energy. This is quantized. When an electron gains energy, it moves to a higher energy level. Thus giving the equation hf=mcv. Therefore, as more energy is given to the electron, it gets 'excited' and maintains the energy by moving to a higher energy leve.
The Law of conservation of energy holds when a photon of light emits from the excited atom, becuase the energy absorbed by the atom during its excitation is exactly balanced by the energy emitted during its de-excitation.
Heat cannot be conserved. Heat is a form of energy. It can be transformed from one form to another. It is derived from the difference in temperature between a body and the surrounding system.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Total energy is conserved, but no, no single form of energy is.
The law of conservation of energy is ALWAYS obeyed.
Yes, it can get lost. TOTAL energy is conserved (i.e., it can't get lost); though (according to the Second Law of Thermodynamics), USEFUL energy can and will decrease over time.
yes!
Yes.
Assuming no energy is lost, the 70 J of potential energy will be converted into 70 J of kinetic energy.Assuming no energy is lost, the 70 J of potential energy will be converted into 70 J of kinetic energy.Assuming no energy is lost, the 70 J of potential energy will be converted into 70 J of kinetic energy.Assuming no energy is lost, the 70 J of potential energy will be converted into 70 J of kinetic energy.
same if none has been lost. ke=0.5Xmv(squared) GPE=massxgravityxheight
This can easily be understood with conservation of energy. Assuming that no energy is lost, potential energy is continuously converted to kinetic energy, and vice versa. At the mean position, the potential energy is zero, therefore the kinetic energy (and hence the velocity) is at maximum.This can easily be understood with conservation of energy. Assuming that no energy is lost, potential energy is continuously converted to kinetic energy, and vice versa. At the mean position, the potential energy is zero, therefore the kinetic energy (and hence the velocity) is at maximum.This can easily be understood with conservation of energy. Assuming that no energy is lost, potential energy is continuously converted to kinetic energy, and vice versa. At the mean position, the potential energy is zero, therefore the kinetic energy (and hence the velocity) is at maximum.This can easily be understood with conservation of energy. Assuming that no energy is lost, potential energy is continuously converted to kinetic energy, and vice versa. At the mean position, the potential energy is zero, therefore the kinetic energy (and hence the velocity) is at maximum.
The object will have lost kinetic energy. This energy has probably gone as heat due to friction.
Same as before the collision. This applies whether the collision was elastic (no loss of kinetic energy) or inelastic (some kinetic energy lost).
Assuming no energy is lost, the 70 J of potential energy will be converted into 70 J of kinetic energy.Assuming no energy is lost, the 70 J of potential energy will be converted into 70 J of kinetic energy.Assuming no energy is lost, the 70 J of potential energy will be converted into 70 J of kinetic energy.Assuming no energy is lost, the 70 J of potential energy will be converted into 70 J of kinetic energy.
same if none has been lost. ke=0.5Xmv(squared) GPE=massxgravityxheight
Kinetic energy can be reconverted into potantial energy, but not with 100% efficiency. Some energe is lost in the process.
No energy is lost in such a collision, although kinetic energy is converted into thermal and possibly into potential energy.
This can easily be understood with conservation of energy. Assuming that no energy is lost, potential energy is continuously converted to kinetic energy, and vice versa. At the mean position, the potential energy is zero, therefore the kinetic energy (and hence the velocity) is at maximum.This can easily be understood with conservation of energy. Assuming that no energy is lost, potential energy is continuously converted to kinetic energy, and vice versa. At the mean position, the potential energy is zero, therefore the kinetic energy (and hence the velocity) is at maximum.This can easily be understood with conservation of energy. Assuming that no energy is lost, potential energy is continuously converted to kinetic energy, and vice versa. At the mean position, the potential energy is zero, therefore the kinetic energy (and hence the velocity) is at maximum.This can easily be understood with conservation of energy. Assuming that no energy is lost, potential energy is continuously converted to kinetic energy, and vice versa. At the mean position, the potential energy is zero, therefore the kinetic energy (and hence the velocity) is at maximum.
The object will have lost kinetic energy. This energy has probably gone as heat due to friction.
- goes into motion. This energy is transformed into kinetic energy. Kinetic energy is changed into heat by the friction process and is finally lost through dissipation.
Heat, noise, stress in materials...
Yes. As the car goes down the hill, the potential energy decreases and the kinetic energy increases. However, not all of the potential energy becomes kinetic energy. Some of it is lost to heat and sound energy.
Kinetic Energy - this is the energy which came from the different radiation . the best example is MAGNET there is a popular energy that can attract to other materials and different metalic objects From: JayRica
Same as before the collision. This applies whether the collision was elastic (no loss of kinetic energy) or inelastic (some kinetic energy lost).
As a result of friction, kinetic energy is commonly lost; the result is heat energy.