better then dyeing, maybe. better then living elsewhere, no.
no
ello mate!
There are animals at the zoo because animals are supposed to be at the zoo. I mean even though there aren't any dogs or cats there are wild animals like lions tigers lizards zebras and a lot more. That's why there are animals at a zoo.
No. In fact, most animals living in a zoo live longer than animals in the wild. That's because There aren't any predators, there's plenty of food, etc.
ZOO CAPTIVITY: nicer and better for animals :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) (i think)
yes. because it's there home, unlike the zoo
999
As of September 2014, the number of animals at the Denver Zoo is 4,125. The Cleveland Metroparks Zoo has 3,000 animals. The Detroit Zoo information page says it has more than 2,600 animals, and the Dallas Zoo has over 2,000. There are over 5,000,000 animals living in zoos worldwide.
Probably depends on which zoo you are referring to.
In some ways, yes, the Santa Barbara Zoo is better than the LA Zoo. For example, the Santa Barbara zoo has more species of animals available for viewing, and they charge less of a an entrance fee.
A safari park is far better than a zoo because there are no cages and visitors get the see the animals behave like they would in their natural habitat.
yes because they are well trained then wild life animals
Reproduction is better for animals in the wild than in the zoo because in the wild,if an animal reproduces, the offspring grow up and learn to live in the wild naturally. If an animal reproduces in the zoo, the offspring would have to be taught to live in the wild or never be let free back into its natural habitat.