Secondary source
It's SECONDARY
It's SECONDARY
A picture can indeed be a primary source.
i think that it is a secondary source because it dosen't look like that person who drew it was there
i think that it is a secondary source because it dosen't look like that person who drew it was there
A picture is not a secondary source it is a primary source only if it was drawn at the time or year it happened in . Lets say obama is elected president and i took a picture of him and send it to 10 people. As long as none of them messed with the picture this is still a primary source.
A picture is not a secondary source it is a primary source only if it was drawn at the time or year it happened in . Lets say obama is elected president and i took a picture of him and send it to 10 people. As long as none of them messed with the picture this is still a primary source.
If a picture is copied directly from the original source, it is still considered a primary source. However, if the picture undergoes alteration or manipulation, it may no longer be considered a primary source.
It depends what the picture is. If it's a picture of a painting in which the artist was there when whatever it was happened (example: a painting of the Battle of Yorktown in which the artist was there) it would be a primary source. If it was a picture where the person wasn't there (example: someone dressed up as George Washington) it would be a secondary source.
i think that it is a secondary source because it dosen't look like that person who drew it was there
A coin is a primary source because it was actually there during a historic time.
is pericles primary source or secondary source