"Lost in thought" is a phrase or a group of words that acts as an adjective to describe someone who is absorbed in their thoughts. It is not a clause because it does not have a subject and a verb to form a complete sentence.
Yes, "You lost the game yesterday" is an independent clause because it can stand alone as a complete sentence and expresses a complete thought.
No, a dependent clause does not express a complete thought on its own. It relies on an independent clause to form a complete sentence.
An independent clause can stand alone as a complete sentence, expressing a complete thought. In contrast, a dependent clause cannot stand alone as a complete sentence and relies on an independent clause to form a complete thought.
An independent clause is a grammatical structure that can stand alone as a complete sentence and express a complete thought. It contains a subject and a predicate and does not require additional information to make sense.
A dependent clause is called a subordinate clause because it cannot stand alone as a complete sentence and relies on an independent clause to form a complete thought. The subordinate clause adds extra information to the independent clause, but cannot function independently.
'Love treasures lost' is an incomplete thought, an incomplete sentence. You need a subject (noun or pronoun) and a clause...She loves finding treasures that werelost.
"What is An independent clause that expresses a complete thought?" is a question, so it is an interrogative sentence.
An Independent clause is independent or main clause expresses a complete thought and can stand by itself as a sentence. An Subordinate clause is a subordinate (or dependent) clause does not express a complete thought and cannot stand by itself as a complete sentence.
Yes, "You lost the game yesterday" is an independent clause because it can stand alone as a complete sentence and expresses a complete thought.
It's an complete thought.
The difference between the independent clause and the dependent clause is: "dependent clause" has a complete thought like for example "the catcher missed the ball" it expresses who missed the ball (the catcher)."independent clause" has no complete thought like for example "the movie idol" it cannot express who is the movie idol.
The difference between the independent clause and the dependent clause is: "dependent clause" has a complete thought like for example "the catcher missed the ball" it expresses who missed the ball (the catcher)."independent clause" has no complete thought like for example "the movie idol" it cannot express who is the movie idol.
An independent clause is a grammatical structure that can stand alone as a complete sentence and express a complete thought. It contains a subject and a predicate and does not require additional information to make sense.
yes
I believe what you mean is a noun clause acting as a direct object. A noun clause is one of three types of dependent clauses, which are used in conjunction with an independent clause and cannot stand alone as complete sentences. A noun clause, as the name indicates, is an dependent clause consisting of a noun or pronoun and a verb. An example would be: "His parents thought that he finished his homework." In this case, the bold segment is the noun clause. The pronoun 'he' is the direct object of the verb 'thought', which is clear if you remove the word 'that' from the sentence. "His parents thought he finished his homework."
A subordinate clause is a clause that can not stand alone as a complete sentence, because it does not express a complete thought
Yes, a dependent clause without a subject is considered a sentence fragment because it does not express a complete thought on its own. It lacks the necessary components to function as a complete sentence.