No, it's the comparative form of neat (an adjective).
sexer
illiterate:read::sightless:see hovel:poverty::hut:shelter lemon:citrus::wheat:grain red:green::blue:orange (because these colors are composite)
yes part of the verb "to be" I am he is she is it is you are we are they are
It is a helping verb.
verb
neater is to tidier as messier is to sloppier
Neatness is not determined by gender. It varies from person to person and is influenced by factors such as upbringing, personal habits, and individual preferences. Both girls and boys can be neat or messy depending on their individual traits.
More neat, neater is not proper grammar.
neater
sexer
cleaner
it is a place that is neater
fastidious
No, but many people use such colloquially. Neater is a comparative adjective (positive-neat,comparative-neater, superlative-neatest). Comparatives and superlatives are not generally modified, other than where necessary by an article (the neatest). Comparatives are typically preceded by a verb and followed by the conjunction than.That is a technical treatment, the wordy form. The short answer is just no. It is redundant to try to modify a comparative adjective. It's sort of like trying to say, "There is more more water in the Pacific Ocean than any other."
Neat -- Neater-- Neatest
tidy
1. cheater 2. heater 3. theatre