0
Ehhh...I can see where you draw some analogous relationship, but not really. "Non-comforming use" refers to a legal noncompliance with a zoning ordinance that came into effect AFTER the current usage/occupancy was established. A competely fictitious (and absurd) example might be that a town says "houses can no longer be painted red". Non-conforming use is the legal right of those houses that were red BEFORE this ordinance came into effect, to remain as they are. Now, ex post facto law enforcement is unconstitutional because it would attempt to criminalize an action that was NOT a crime before said law, ordinance or order would have come into effect. Joey is sleeping in his car at a public university on a Friday night. The following Monday, a local ordinance is passed that sleeping in your car in a public parking lot is illegal. The constitution says that you CANNOT prosecute Joey for his Friday nap, because when he took it, it was NOT illegal. Such an attempted prosecution would be ex post facto, and is thus illegal itself, and not permitted. Ahh!! But, *yes*, any attempt to penalize or criminalize the owners of those long-standing red houses would be ex post facto. Not allowed. Our constitution absolutely forbids it. In this hypothetical, the law forbids the NEW painting red of currently non-red houses. The ones that were already red, are "grand-fathered" and are legally allowed to remain as they are.
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the Latin phrase for retrospective action?
ex post facto ex post facto
What is Latin for after the fact?
I believe it's "ex post facto."
Is it true an ex post facto law is a law that makes an act illegal after the act has been committed?
Yes, an ex post facto law cannot impose punishment on a person who committed an act before it was illegal. This includes increasing the severity of the punishment from what it was when the crime was committed. Ex post facto applies to criminal law and not civil law as interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court. Also, some laws, for example the sex offenders registry, are considered a regulatory device for public safety and not a punitive action. no ex-post facto law after the fact. no ex-post facto law after the fact.
What is the difference between ex post facto approval and post facto approval?
Ex-ost-facto means the rules applicable at the time of before the happenings for which which approval sought and post-facto means the rules applicable at the time after the happenings for which the approval is sought.
What is ex post facoto?
I think you mean ex post facto, which is latin for "after the fact" I think you mean ex post facto, which is latin for "after the fact"
What term means to punish someone for something that was not illegal when it was done?
The legal term for a law that has criminal penalties that effect people prior to the enactment of that law is called an "ex-post facto law". Ex-post facto laws are illegal in most countries and the US Constitution expressly forbids the creation or passage of an ex-post facto law.
How does the US Supreme Court interpret ex post facto laws?
Ex post facto laws are specifically prohibited by the Constitution.
What type of law punishes a person for doing something that was not illegal at the time it was done?
That would be making a law retroactive to a date before the passing of the law. The US Constitution forbids doing it. That would be known as an Ex Post Facto Law and is unconstitutional.
What is name of a law that makes something a crime after the fact?
Ex Post Facto law "Congress shall pass no Ex Post Facto law", I believe is how it appears in the constitution. It is latin for after the fact.
What are 4 different types of ex post facto laws?
Retroactive criminal laws that criminalize an action that was not illegal when committed. Laws that increase the punishment for a crime after it has been committed. Laws that change the rules of evidence required for conviction after the crime has been committed. Laws that alter the legal consequences of an action that was lawful when performed.
A law passed making something illegal after the fact?
Making something illegal retroactively violates the principle of legality, which ensures that individuals have fair notice of what is prohibited. It is generally considered unjust and contrary to the rule of law because people cannot be held accountable for actions that weren't unlawful at the time they were committed.
Im doing a case in school and how will do you know if Ex Post Facto Law applys?
(in the US) Ex Post Facto laws are forbidden by the US Constitution.
