AA meetings can be admissible in court. If they are court ordered or relevant to an issue or evidence, then it usually is admissible.
Your mode of dress is not admissible in court. The evidence cries to be admissible, your honor!
The evidence was not admissible in court due to it having no relevance to the proceedings.
The bloodhound is the only animal whose evidence is admissible in a US court.
In a court of law the only evidence that can be admissible must be gotten legally.
no
In the UK if it is evidence to a crime, Oh yes.
Yes, from what I have seen on court TV shows. There is a lot of info in the headers that can make them reliable evidence.
Yes. If it is relevant to an issue and meets the other evidence rules, it is admissible.
A polygraph examination is admissible in court only by the stipulation (agreement) of both parties. This is true in all U.S. courts, not just Indiana. Polygraph evidence is seldom used in court.
No. They can be fooled which is why they are not admissible as evidence in a court of law (at least in the US)
To start, much of the evidence must be backed up with factual evidence, so that the circumstancial evidence is minimal.